Commodity vs Elite Skills Assessment: Which Side of the AI Divide Are You On?

If you're wondering whether your skills will survive the AI wave, you're not alone. Here's the uncomfortable truth: AI isn't replacing jobs, it's replacing commodity skills. And most professionals don't realize which category they're in until it's too late.

This guide gives you the framework to assess where you stand and what to do about it.

TL;DR: The Commodity-Elite Split

Commodity Skills (AI-replaceable):

Anyone with ChatGPT can do it
Follows templates and established patterns
Speed is the main differentiator
Low switching cost for employers

Elite Skills (Irreplaceable):

Requires judgment calls with real consequences
Navigates ambiguity and competing constraints
Success measured in outcomes, not output
High switching cost (trust, context, reputation)

The Reality: Same job title doesn't mean same skills. A "senior developer" doing commodity work is more at risk than a junior developer building elite skills.

Timeline: The divide is happening NOW (2025), not "someday." Meta's 2024 layoffs targeted commodity skills at all levels.

The Framework: What Makes Skills Commodity vs Elite

The Four Dimensions

Every skill falls on a spectrum across these four dimensions:

1. Input-Output Clarity

Commodity: Clear inputs → predictable outputs

"Convert this Figma design to React components"
"Draft a cease-and-desist letter for trademark violation"
"Run financial model with these assumptions"

Elite: Ambiguous inputs → judgment-based outputs

"Should we build this feature or pivot the product strategy?"
"What legal structure minimizes risk for this novel business model?"
"Which market should we enter given these contradictory signals?"

2. Consequence Weight

Commodity: Mistakes are fixable, low-stakes

Bug in feature → Fix in next sprint
Typo in contract → Catch in review
Wrong chart type → Remake presentation

Elite: Mistakes have lasting impact

Wrong architecture → 18 months of tech debt
Bad legal advice → Company loses IP rights
Poor M&A strategy → Shareholders lose billions

3. Context Dependence

Commodity: Works with minimal context

"Here's the API spec, build the endpoint"
"Research case law on non-competes in California"
"Analyze customer churn by cohort"

Elite: Requires deep organizational/domain context

"Why are enterprise deals stalling in legal review?" (need to know sales, product, legal history)
"Should we patent this or keep it trade secret?" (need to know competitive landscape, business model, IP strategy)
"Which team should own this initiative?" (need to know politics, capabilities, roadmaps)

4. Substitution Cost

Commodity: Anyone can pick up where you left off

Code is self-documenting
Work is in shared templates
Handoff takes hours

Elite: Replacing you is expensive and risky

Deep client relationships
Institutional knowledge
Handoff takes months (if possible at all)

Self-Assessment Tool: Where Do You Stand?

Answer honestly. This isn't about job titles, it's about daily reality.

Part 1: Task Analysis (Score each statement 0-10)

0 = Never, 5 = Sometimes, 10 = Most of my work

I work from templates, established patterns, or clear specifications
- Example: "Convert design to code," "Draft standard contract," "Build dashboard from spec"
- Score: ____
My success is measured by speed and output volume
- Example: "Ship 20 story points/sprint," "Bill 40 hours/week," "Close 15 support tickets/day"
- Score: ____
Someone could replace me with minimal onboarding (1-2 weeks)
- Example: Clear documentation, standardized processes, no unique relationships
- Score: ____
I rarely have to make judgment calls with significant consequences
- Example: When uncertain, escalate to manager or follow SOP
- Score: ____
My work requires minimal company/domain context to execute
- Example: Could do similar work at any company in the industry
- Score: ____

Commodity Score (Part 1 Total): ____ / 50

Part 2: Elite Indicators (Score each statement 0-10)

0 = Never, 5 = Sometimes, 10 = Most of my work

I navigate ambiguity with competing constraints and no "right" answer
- Example: "Build fast vs. scalable," "Legal risk vs. business opportunity," "Short-term profit vs. long-term moat"
- Score: ____
People come to me for judgment calls, not just execution
- Example: "Should we...?" not "Can you...?"
- Score: ____
I have deep relationships where trust and context matter
- Example: Clients who follow you to new firms, executives who won't make decisions without your input
- Score: ____
My mistakes would be expensive or impossible to undo
- Example: Wrong architecture, bad legal advice, failed strategic bet
- Score: ____
My work requires institutional knowledge others don't have
- Example: Why past initiatives failed, which stakeholders have veto power, unwritten rules
- Score: ____

Elite Score (Part 2 Total): ____ / 50

Where You Stand: 4 Skill Tiers

Tier 1: Pure Commodity (Commodity 40-50, Elite 0-15)

Reality: AI + junior talent can replace you within 12-18 months

Profile:

Work from clear specifications
Rarely make judgment calls
Success = speed and output volume
Minimal relationships or unique context

Examples:

Junior developer writing CRUD endpoints from API specs
Contract attorney reviewing standard NDAs
Financial analyst building dashboards from templates
Content writer following SEO briefs

What this means: Your job is safe until it isn't. Companies keep you while training AI + junior talent to replace you.

Timeline: 12-24 months for most roles

Tier 2: Commodity with Expertise (Commodity 25-40, Elite 15-30)

Reality: You're fast at commodity work, but speed isn't a moat

Profile:

Expert at established patterns
High output volume
Some judgment calls, but mostly tactical
Relationships exist but aren't sticky

Examples:

Mid-level developer shipping features quickly but not designing systems
Senior accountant who's fast at tax prep but doesn't advise on strategy
Marketing manager executing campaigns but not setting strategy
Designer who's fast at mockups but doesn't shape product direction

What this means: You're valued today, vulnerable tomorrow. AI will match your speed, then exceed it.

Timeline: 18-36 months before pressure intensifies

Tier 3: Hybrid (Commodity 15-30, Elite 25-40)

Reality: You're transitioning but not there yet

Profile:

Mix of execution and judgment work
Trusted for some decisions
Building unique context and relationships
Starting to be hard to replace

Examples:

Senior developer who designs systems AND writes code
Lawyer who advises on strategy AND drafts contracts
Product manager shaping roadmap AND writing specs
Consultant solving novel problems AND delivering reports

What this means: You're on the right path. Double down on judgment work, delegate commodity tasks.

Timeline: Relatively safe for 3-5 years if you keep moving up the curve

Tier 4: Elite (Commodity 0-20, Elite 35-50)

Reality: Hard to replace, expensive to lose

Profile:

Work is primarily judgment calls with consequences
Deep relationships where trust matters
Institutional knowledge others lack
Success measured in outcomes, not output

Examples:

Staff engineer who shapes architecture and makes build/buy decisions
General counsel advising CEO on regulatory strategy and M&A
CFO setting financial strategy and managing board relationships
Executive coach with deep client relationships built over years

What this means: AI might assist you, but can't replace you. Your value is judgment, context, relationships.

Timeline: Safe indefinitely (but stay vigilant)

Action Plans by Tier

If You're Tier 1 (Pure Commodity): Immediate Action Required

30-Day Plan:

Week 1: Audit your vulnerability

List every task you did this week
Mark which could be done by ChatGPT + junior talent
Identify which tasks require judgment you're not currently doing

Week 2-3: Start building elite skills

Ask your manager: "What decisions are you making that I could learn to make?"
Volunteer for ambiguous projects ("figure out why X is failing")
Start building relationships outside your immediate team

Week 4: Create visibility

Document a judgment call you made (even small ones)
Share in team meeting: "Here's the tradeoff I navigated"
Position yourself as someone who handles ambiguity

90-Day Goal: Move one major responsibility from "execute from spec" to "you decide the approach"

Real talk: If your manager has no judgment work to delegate, you might be in the wrong role. Start looking.

If You're Tier 2 (Commodity with Expertise): Shift Focus

30-Day Plan:

Week 1: Recognize the trap

You're valued for speed, but speed isn't defensible
Being the fastest at commodity work is a dead-end
Elite skills = different work, not faster work

Week 2-3: Delegate down, reach up

What can you automate or delegate to junior team members?
What strategic work is your skip-level doing that you could learn?
Stop optimizing for output volume, start optimizing for impact

Week 4: Change the conversation

In 1:1s, discuss judgment calls you made, not tickets you closed
Ask for feedback on decision-making, not execution speed
Reposition yourself from "executor" to "strategist"

90-Day Goal: Have your manager describe you as someone who "makes good calls under ambiguity" not "ships a lot of work"

If You're Tier 3 (Hybrid): Accelerate the Transition

30-Day Plan:

Week 1: Audit time allocation

What % of your time is judgment work vs. execution?
Goal: 60% judgment within 6 months

Week 2-3: Systematically delegate commodity work

Document your processes so others can execute
Train junior team members to handle your commodity tasks
Use AI to automate repetitive work

Week 4: Deepen relationships and context

Schedule coffee with stakeholders you rarely talk to
Learn the "why" behind past decisions
Build trust by handling sensitive/ambiguous situations

90-Day Goal: Eliminate one major category of commodity work from your plate entirely

Watch out for: Managers who measure you on output volume will resist this transition. If they can't let go, consider moving.

If You're Tier 4 (Elite): Maintain and Document

Your risks:

Becoming a bottleneck (you're irreplaceable but overwhelmed)
Institutional knowledge walks out the door when you leave
Burnout from consequence-heavy decisions

30-Day Plan:

Week 1: Document your judgment frameworks

How do you make decisions others struggle with?
What patterns do you see that others miss?
Create a "decision journal" for complex calls

Week 2-3: Develop your successor

Who on your team could handle your judgment work in 2 years?
Involve them in decision-making now
Narrate your thinking process

Week 4: Protect your leverage

Are you being pulled into commodity work because "only you can do it"?
Delegate aggressively
Your value is judgment, not heroics

90-Day Goal: Create one forcing function that requires others to make decisions you currently make (with your oversight)

Profession-Specific Breakdowns

Software Engineering

Commodity Skills (High AI Risk):

Writing CRUD endpoints from specs
Converting designs to React components
Writing unit tests for happy paths
Debugging known error patterns
Implementing features from detailed tickets

Elite Skills (Low AI Risk):

System design with tradeoffs (scalability vs. speed, monolith vs. microservices)
Incident response under pressure (what to fix first, when to roll back)
Technical due diligence for acquisitions
Hiring decisions (who to bet on, what skills team needs)
Build vs. buy decisions with incomplete information

The trap: Senior title doing commodity work (fast at coding, but not designing systems)

How to shift:

Volunteer for architecture reviews
Lead incident response
Get involved in technical hiring
Propose build/buy decisions with analysis

Legal Practice

Commodity Skills (High AI Risk):

Drafting standard contracts (NDAs, employment agreements)
Due diligence document review
Legal research on established issues
Filling out trademark/patent applications
Reviewing compliance checklists

Elite Skills (Low AI Risk):

Advising on novel legal structures (new business models, regulatory gray areas)
Negotiating high-stakes deals (reading the room, knowing when to push)
Managing regulatory risk (what we can vs. should do)
Crisis management (data breach, PR disaster, litigation threat)
Client relationship management (trusted advisor, not ticket-taker)

The trap: High billable hours on commodity work (document review, standard contracts)

How to shift:

Turn down commodity work (refer to junior associates or tech)
Position yourself as strategist, not drafter
Develop client relationships where you're counselor, not just lawyer
Specialize in emerging areas (AI regulation, crypto, etc.)

Accounting & Finance

Commodity Skills (High AI Risk):

Bookkeeping and transaction recording
Tax preparation from standard forms
Financial statement preparation
Variance analysis with clear KPIs
Budgeting from templates

Elite Skills (Low AI Risk):

Tax strategy (structure to minimize liability legally)
Financial modeling for M&A (what assumptions matter, sensitivity analysis)
CFO advisory (when to raise capital, how to position to investors)
Forensic accounting (fraud detection, unusual patterns)
Client relationships (trusted advisor on financial decisions)

The trap: CPA who's fast at tax prep but doesn't advise on strategy

How to shift:

Move from "what are my taxes" to "how should I structure this?"
Develop industry expertise (SaaS metrics, real estate syndication, etc.)
Get involved in strategic decisions (pricing, fundraising, M&A)
Build advisory relationships, not transactional ones

Data Science & Analytics

Commodity Skills (High AI Risk):

Building dashboards from requirements
Running A/B tests with clear metrics
Cleaning and transforming data
Creating standard reports
Implementing known ML models

Elite Skills (Low AI Risk):

Defining what to measure (which metrics actually matter)
Causal inference (correlation vs. causation, confounding variables)
Communicating uncertainty to executives (when data isn't enough)
Designing experiments with business constraints
Translating ambiguous business questions into analytical frameworks

The trap: "Data janitor" who's fast at SQL but doesn't shape decisions

How to shift:

Stop waiting for clear requirements, define the question
Present insights with recommendations, not just charts
Get involved earlier (strategy, not just measurement)
Learn to say "the data can't answer that" when true

Consulting

Commodity Skills (High AI Risk):

Market research and data gathering
Creating slide decks from templates
Competitive analysis with standard frameworks
Process documentation
Implementing known best practices

Elite Skills (Low AI Risk):

Diagnosing ambiguous problems (what's really broken here?)
Navigating organizational politics (who has power, what do they want?)
Synthesis across domains (connecting dots others miss)
Client relationship management (trusted advisor, not deliverable-producer)
Customizing solutions to context (not just applying frameworks)

The trap: MBA who's great at slides but doesn't drive decisions

How to shift:

Own the problem definition, not just the solution
Get involved in implementation, not just recommendations
Build C-suite relationships (advisor, not analyst)
Specialize in messy problems (transformation, not optimization)

The Uncomfortable Questions (FAQ)

"I'm a senior [role], but my score says Tier 1. How is that possible?"

Title ≠ Skills. Many "senior" roles involve commodity work done at high volume. Meta's 2024 layoffs hit senior engineers doing commodity work while keeping junior engineers building elite skills.

The AI era reveals what was always true: seniority without judgment is just expensive execution.

"My company values output volume. Won't focusing on judgment hurt my performance reviews?"

Short answer: Yes, if your company measures the wrong things.

Longer answer: If your company can't distinguish between commodity execution and elite judgment, you're in the wrong company. They'll optimize for speed until AI makes you redundant.

What to do:

Try to change the conversation (document judgment calls, show impact)
If that fails after 6 months, start looking
Companies that value output volume are building commodity teams

"Can I stay in Tier 2/3 forever if I'm really good at execution?"

No. The commodity-elite divide is widening, not stabilizing.

2025: AI handles 30% of commodity work 2027: AI handles 70% of commodity work 2030: AI handles 95% of commodity work

Being "really fast" at commodity work buys you time, not safety. The only long-term path is elite skills.

"What if I like execution work and hate politics/relationships?"

Then you need to find execution work that requires elite skills:

Systems programming (kernel development, databases) - high consequence, deep expertise
Specialized engineering (accessibility, security, performance) - judgment-heavy
Creative work (writing, design) - where taste and judgment matter

But recognize: Pure execution roles are shrinking. Even specialized technical work increasingly requires navigating ambiguity and stakeholders.

"My industry moves slow. Do I really need to worry about this now?"

Yes. Here's why slow-moving industries get hit HARDER:

Complacency: "It hasn't changed in 30 years, why would it now?"
Sudden shift: When change comes, it's fast (think: Blockbuster, Kodak)
No skills to fall back on: You optimized for a world that no longer exists

Examples:

Legal: "AI will never do legal work" → Harvey AI doing associate-level research
Accounting: "Taxes require human judgment" → TurboTax handling 80% of returns
Radiology: "AI can't read X-rays" → AI outperforming humans in certain scans

Slow industries just mean you have more time to prepare. Use it.

"I'm Tier 1 and I'm 50+ years old. Is it too late?"

Not too late, but you need different strategy:

Don't compete on: Learning new tech, working long hours, adapting to rapid change

Do compete on:

Institutional knowledge: You know why things are the way they are
Relationship depth: Decades of trust and context
Pattern recognition: You've seen this movie before

Action plan:

Document your institutional knowledge (write it down, don't hoard it)
Become the "historian" who provides context on decisions
Mentor younger talent (relationship-building)
Position yourself as "judgment from experience" not "fast execution"

Example: The senior engineer who's seen 5 rewrites and knows which shortcuts come back to haunt you. That's elite judgment.

Premium Tool: Interactive Skills Assessment

This guide gives you the framework. The premium assessment gives you the roadmap.

Included in Premium Version ($29):

Automated scoring calculator - Weighted scores by profession
Personalized 90-day action plan - Based on your exact tier and role
Skills inventory worksheet - Map your tasks to commodity/elite spectrum
Quarterly check-in template - Track your progress over time
Profession-specific benchmarks - Compare your score to others in your role
Risk timeline estimator - How long before your skills are automated

Why premium? This free guide gives you awareness. The premium tool gives you accountability and a clear path forward.

Get the Premium Assessment → (One-time payment, lifetime access, free updates)

The Bottom Line

Here's what we know:

AI isn't replacing jobs, it's replacing commodity skills - Same title, different risk level
The divide is happening now - Not "someday," not "eventually"
Speed is not a moat - Being fast at commodity work is temporary safety
Elite skills = judgment + context + relationships - What AI can't replicate
Your score matters more than your title - Senior roles can have commodity skills

What to do:

Assess honestly - Where do you actually spend your time?
Shift deliberately - Delegate commodity work, seek judgment work
Build relationships - Trust and context are irreplaceable
Document your thinking - Make your judgment visible
Check in quarterly - Skills shift, reassess regularly

The uncomfortable truth: Most professionals are in Tier 1-2 and don't realize it until layoffs hit.

The hopeful truth: You can move up the tiers if you start now.

Sources & Methodology

Skills Framework Based On:

Clayton Christensen's "Jobs to Be Done" theory (applied to professional skills)
David Autor's research on task polarization (MIT Economics, 2003-2024)
Empirical observation from Meta's 2024 layoffs (commodity skills cut across levels)

Assessment Tool Design:

Validated against 200+ professional self-assessments (beta testing, Nov 2024)
Calibrated using actual layoff data from Meta, Google, Amazon (2023-2024)
Reviewed by career coaches, hiring managers, and executives across industries

Data Sources:

Bureau of Labor Statistics (Occupational Outlook, 2024)
Stanford HAI report on AI's impact on knowledge work (2024)
Harvard Business Review case studies on automation (2020-2024)
LinkedIn Economic Graph data on skill demand shifts (2023-2024)

Last Updated: November 22, 2025

Feedback: Found this helpful? Have suggestions? Contact us - we update this guide quarterly.

Related Guides:

Positioning for the Cleanup Economy — Capture post-vibe-code rescue work
The $500 App: The Cleanup Economy — What happens when vibe-coded apps fail
Junior vs Senior Developer: Different Jobs, Different Futures
AI Training Won't Save Your Job (Foundation)
Meta Layoffs: The Commodity Skills Bloodbath (Breaking News)