Can Robots Take My Job?
Back to Blog
blog
16 min read

Software Engineer Denial: LinkedIn vs Reality

Software engineers on LinkedIn say they're safe from AI. The data disagrees: entry-level jobs down 60%, bootcamp grads can't get interviews.

Can Robots Take My Job Team•
Software Engineer Denial: LinkedIn vs Reality

The Great Software Engineer Denial: Why LinkedIn Is Full of Copium While Entry-Level Devs Can't Find Jobs

Software engineers on LinkedIn are posting about how "AI will never replace real developers" while simultaneously, entry-level job postings have dropped 60% since 2022, bootcamp graduates can't get interviews, and a high school teacher just built a functional web app for $20 in AI tokens.

The disconnect is stunning. And it's not just annoying—it's dangerous for people trying to break into the field.

TL;DR: The Reality Check

Entry-Level Market:

  • Software engineering job postings down 60% since 2022
  • Entry-level positions down 35% from January 2023 to June 2025
  • Employment for ages 22-25 developers declined nearly 20% from late 2022 peak
  • Gen Z tech workforce cut in half (15% → 6.8%) in two years

AI Adoption:

  • 85% of developers now use AI coding tools regularly
  • 62% rely on AI coding assistants daily
  • GitHub Copilot: 20+ million users, 90% of Fortune 100 companies
  • Cursor AI: 43% organizational adoption (vs Copilot's 37%)

The brutal truth: Junior developer positions aren't disappearing in 5 years. They're gone now.

The LinkedIn Copium Theater

A recent Reddit discussion exposed the stark divide between what software engineers say publicly and what they admit privately.

The public persona (LinkedIn):

  • "AI is just a tool, like a better IDE"
  • "It'll only replace bad developers"
  • "I have 10 years experience, I'm safe"
  • "Junior devs just need to work harder"

The private reality (DMs and Reddit):

  • "Entry-level is fucked, I'd never recommend this field to someone starting out"
  • "We're hiring 1 senior + AI instead of 3 juniors"
  • "Boot camp grads can't even get interviews anymore"
  • "The juniors we do hire need senior-level debugging skills from day one"

The 10-year veterans saying "I'm safe" are the canaries warning everyone else to get out of the mine.

The $20 Web App That Changes Everything

Let's be real: One anecdote from the Reddit thread captures the paradigm shift better than any think piece.

The story: A high school teacher with zero coding background built a functional web app in one week using AI. Total cost: $20 in AI tokens.

Not a landing page. Not a WordPress site. A custom web application.

What this means:

  • The barrier to building software just dropped to near-zero
  • You don't need to know syntax anymore, you need to know what you want
  • "Can you code?" is being replaced by "Can you direct AI to code?"
  • Welcome to "vibe coding" - describing what you want until it works

The economist's view: When the cost of producing something drops 99%, the value of that skill drops proportionally. Doesn't matter how good you were at the old way.

The Data They Don't Want You to See

Entry-Level Employment Collapse

From Stanford Digital Economy Study:

  • Employment for software developers aged 22-25 down nearly 20% from late 2022 peak (as of July 2025)
  • For AI-exposed IT roles, employment declined 6% for ages 22-25 while increasing 9% for ages 35-49
  • Workers aged 22-25 in AI-exposed jobs saw 13% employment decline since 2022

From Indeed and job posting data:

  • Software engineer job listings at 65% of February 2020 levels
  • 3.5x fewer vacancies compared to mid-2022 peak
  • Entry-level postings down 60% between 2022 and 2024
  • Postings for entry-level jobs plunged 35% from January 2023 to June 2025

Translation: If you're trying to land your first dev job in 2025, you're competing for one-third as many positions as someone in 2023, against a massive influx of laid-off mid-level engineers.

AI Tool Adoption Explosion

GitHub Copilot:

  • 20+ million users (5 million added in last 3 months alone)
  • 90% of Fortune 100 companies use it
  • 75% of engineers now use AI coding assistance
  • Some teams report 80% daily active usage within first month

Cursor AI:

  • 43% organizational adoption (overtaking Copilot's 37% in some surveys)
  • $500M+ ARR (annual recurring revenue)
  • Positioned as "AI-native" coding environment

Claude AI for coding:

  • 53% adoption rate among developers
  • 49% of organizations use multiple AI coding tools simultaneously

The math: When 75-85% of developers are using AI assistance, the 15-25% who aren't are falling catastrophically behind. And when companies can get 3X productivity from senior devs with AI, why hire juniors at all?

Bootcamp Graduate Reality

The coding bootcamp promise was: "12-16 weeks → $70K+ job".

The 2025 reality:

Employment rates:

  • 79% of bootcamp grads land tech jobs (sounds good!)
  • But: 1-6 months job search (vs 2-3 weeks in 2021)
  • 82% employed within 6 months (vs 90%+ in previous years)
  • Starting salaries: $70K-$90K (stagnant since 2021 despite inflation)

The fine print:

  • "Tech industry layoffs expected to continue through 2025"
  • "Days of bootcamps being a guaranteed ticket to six-figure jobs are over"
  • "Students need realistic expectations"

Translation: Bootcamps can still work, but you're fighting against laid-off engineers with 5+ years experience for entry-level positions. Good luck.

The Unemployment Reality

Computer engineering graduates: 7.5% unemployment rate Computer science graduates: 6.1% unemployment rate

Both higher than the national average (which hovers around 4%).

Think about that. Computer science was supposed to be the "safest" degree. Now CS grads have worse employment prospects than the average worker.

The Commodity vs Elite Split (Again)

This is the same pattern we saw with Meta's AI layoffs. The market is bifurcating into two groups:

Commodity Developers (High Risk)

Skills:

  • Can use frameworks (React, Vue, Angular)
  • Knows syntax and common patterns
  • Follows tutorials and Stack Overflow
  • Writes CRUD apps and standard features
  • Debugs using trial-and-error

AI replacement timeline: Already happening

Why they're vulnerable:

  • AI can generate standard React components faster than humans
  • AI knows every framework and can write in any language instantly
  • Stack Overflow knowledge is baked into GPT-4
  • Companies get 10X output by pairing 1 senior + AI vs hiring 5 juniors

The harsh reality: If your skill is "I can build a to-do app in React," AI can do that for $0.02 in tokens.

Elite Developers (Lower Risk, Role Evolution)

Skills:

  • System design and architecture decisions
  • Performance optimization and debugging complex issues
  • Security and infrastructure expertise
  • Leading teams and mentoring (the irony: no juniors to mentor)
  • Understanding business context and translating to technical solutions

AI replacement timeline: 5-10+ years, role transformation

Why they're safer (for now):

  • AI can't (yet) make architectural tradeoff decisions
  • Complex debugging still requires deep system understanding
  • Security expertise requires adversarial thinking
  • Business context and stakeholder management can't be automated

But: Their role is evolving from "write code" to "direct AI to write code while I focus on architecture and business problems."

What LinkedIn Gets Wrong

Myth 1: "AI Will Only Replace Bad Developers"

What they mean: "I'm good, so I'm safe. Those other developers are bad."

The reality: AI is replacing junior developers, not bad ones. Junior ≠ bad. Junior = learning.

The data:

  • 37% of employers would rather "hire" AI than a recent graduate
  • Companies using generative AI see 9-10% drop in junior employment within 6 quarters (Harvard study)
  • Senior employment barely changes

Translation: AI isn't replacing incompetent people. It's eliminating the entry-level training ground where people become competent.

Myth 2: "10 Years Experience Makes Me Safe"

What they mean: "I've got a decade of pattern recognition and battle scars."

The reality: You're safer than juniors, but your safety depends on which patterns you learned.

If your 10 years taught you:

  • How to quickly scaffold apps with frameworks → AI does this faster
  • Every syntax quirk in JavaScript → AI knows more languages instantly
  • How to Google and adapt Stack Overflow solutions → AI has Stack Overflow memorized

Then AI is a threat.

If your 10 years taught you:

  • How systems fail at scale and how to prevent it → AI can't learn this (yet)
  • How to make architecture decisions with business tradeoffs → AI lacks context
  • How to debug production incidents with incomplete information → AI needs prompts
  • How to lead teams and translate business needs → AI can't replace human judgment

Then you're repositioning, not safe. Your job is changing from "senior developer" to "AI-augmented architect/leader."

Myth 3: "Just Work Harder and Learn More"

What they mean: "If you can't get a job, it's because you're not good enough."

The reality: When job postings drop 60% and competition increases 400%, working harder doesn't fix a market structure problem.

The math:

  • 2022: 100 entry-level jobs, 100 applicants = 100% placement rate
  • 2025: 40 entry-level jobs, 200 applicants = 20% placement rate

You can be 5X better and still not get hired because there aren't enough chairs when the music stops.

This isn't a skills problem. It's a market collapse.

Here's What's Actually Happening

The New Hiring Model

Old model (2015-2022):

  1. Hire 10 junior developers at $70K each = $700K
  2. Hire 5 mid-level developers at $120K each = $600K
  3. Hire 2 senior developers at $180K each = $360K
  4. Total team: 17 people, $1.66M

New model (2025):

  1. Hire 0 junior developers = $0
  2. Hire 2 mid-level developers at $130K each = $260K
  3. Hire 3 senior developers at $200K each = $600K
  4. Buy GitHub Copilot Enterprise for 5 devs at $40/month = $2.4K/year
  5. Total team: 5 people + AI, $862K

Savings: $798K (48% cost reduction) Productivity: Same or better output (per company claims)

The victims: The 10 junior developers who never get hired.

The "Vibe Coding" Threat

The teacher building a web app for $20 isn't an isolated case. It's a pattern.

"Vibe coding" = Non-developers using AI to build software by describing what they want.

Examples:

  • Marketing manager builds internal analytics dashboard (previously required dev team)
  • Sales rep creates customer portal (previously 6-month dev project)
  • Teacher builds classroom management web app (previously impossible without hiring developer)

What this means for developers:

  • The market for simple web apps is evaporating
  • Clients who would've hired a junior dev for $5K now spend $50 on AI tokens
  • The "build a portfolio of small projects" advice no longer works (why hire you when they can vibe-code it?)

The economist's perspective: You're not just competing with other developers anymore. You're competing with AI-augmented non-developers who can now build 70% of what clients need.

What This Means for You

The market is splitting developers into two groups: commodity skills (at risk) vs elite skills (evolving but safer).

If You're Junior/Entry-Level (0-3 years)

Reality: You're facing the toughest job market in a decade. But understanding the commodity vs elite split helps you position yourself strategically.

What to do:

  • Assess where your skills fall on the commodity-elite spectrum
  • Focus on judgment work, not just code execution
  • Understand vibe coding - it's both threat and opportunity

Read the full breakdown: Junior vs Senior Developer: Different Jobs, Different Futures - Detailed analysis of the junior market collapse with specific action plans.

If You're Mid-Level (3-6 years)

Reality: You're in the squeeze - faster than juniors, but AI-augmented non-developers can match your speed on commodity work.

What to do:

  • Move from execution to judgment - shift your role from "implement feature X" to "decide how to build X"
  • Embrace AI tools to 2-3x your productivity
  • Specialize in areas AI struggles with

Assess your position: Commodity vs Elite Skills Assessment - Self-assessment tool to evaluate your skills and get a personalized action plan.

If You're Senior (7+ years)

Reality: Your role is transforming from "I write code" to "I architect systems and orchestrate AI + humans."

What to do:

  • Master AI-augmented workflows (Copilot, Cursor, Claude)
  • Document your architectural decisions - this knowledge is what AI can't replicate
  • Position yourself as AI-native architect who ships 5x faster

Understand the shift: The Vibe Coding Revolution - How to embrace AI as force multiplier instead of seeing it as threat.

For Everyone: The Two Questions

Question 1: Are your skills commodity (AI-replaceable) or elite (judgment-based)? → Take the assessment

Question 2: How do you adapt to vibe coding without losing your value? → Read the guide

The Uncomfortable Questions

"Should I still learn to code in 2025?"

Short answer: Depends on your goal.

If your goal is: Get a $70K+ job as a developer → No, the entry-level market is collapsing

If your goal is: Understand how software works to be better at another role (product, design, data) → Yes, absolutely

If your goal is: Build your own products / be a founder → Yes, but focus on AI-augmented development, not traditional coding

"Is a coding bootcamp worth it in 2025?"

Short answer: Only if you have a strong network or prior tech experience.

The data:

  • 79% employment rate sounds good
  • But that's down from 90%+ in previous years
  • Job search now takes 1-6 months vs 2-3 weeks
  • You're competing against laid-off engineers with real experience

When it might work:

  • You have connections in tech who can refer you
  • You have prior experience (career switcher, not true beginner)
  • You're in a hot local market with demand
  • You can afford 6+ month job search

When it won't work:

  • You're a true beginner with no network
  • You need a job immediately after graduation
  • You're relying solely on job placement statistics

"Are senior developers really safe?"

Short answer: Safer than juniors, but "safe" is the wrong word. "Transforming" is more accurate.

What's safe:

  • Companies still need architectural decisions
  • Complex debugging still requires expertise
  • Security and infrastructure need human judgment
  • Technical leadership can't be automated (yet)

What's changing:

  • Your role shifts from "I write code" to "I direct AI and make decisions"
  • You need to become fluent with AI coding tools (not just aware)
  • The "10X engineer" becomes "1 engineer with 10X AI leverage"

The catch: If you resist AI tools and cling to "I write every line myself," you're making yourself obsolete even with 15 years experience.

"What about the people saying 'AI can't replace developers'?"

They're both right and wrong.

Right about:

  • AI can't (yet) make high-level architectural decisions
  • AI lacks business context and stakeholder understanding
  • AI can't lead teams or mentor juniors
  • AI struggles with complex debugging across systems

Wrong about:

  • AI only replaces "bad" developers (it's replacing entry-level roles, not incompetent ones)
  • "Learning fundamentals" protects you (AI knows fundamentals better than humans)
  • The market will absorb displaced juniors elsewhere (the data shows it won't)
  • This is just hype and will blow over (adoption rates say otherwise)

The synthesis: AI isn't replacing all developers. It's eliminating the junior developer career path while transforming senior roles into AI-augmented positions.

The problem: That's how you become a senior developer—by being a junior first.

The Real Risk: The Missing Middle

Here's the terrifying long-term implication nobody's talking about.

The traditional path:

  1. Junior dev (0-2 years): Learn fundamentals, make mistakes safely
  2. Mid-level dev (3-6 years): Own features, mentor juniors
  3. Senior dev (7+ years): Architect systems, make tradeoff decisions
  4. Staff/Principal (10+ years): Set technical direction, mentor seniors

The AI-disrupted reality:

  1. Junior dev (0-2 years): Roles disappearing
  2. Mid-level dev (3-6 years): Fewer roles, must compete with AI-augmented seniors
  3. Senior dev (7+ years): Role safe but transformed (fewer people reaching this level)
  4. Staff/Principal (10+ years): Who mentors them if junior pipeline is broken?

The question: If companies stop hiring juniors in 2025, where do the senior developers of 2032 come from?

Possible answers:

  1. They don't exist - companies rely increasingly on AI, shrinking dev teams
  2. Elite programs only - only top CS grads from top schools get junior roles
  3. Self-taught survivors - people who build substantial projects on their own and break in despite odds
  4. Career switchers - people with other expertise who learn AI-augmented development

None of these are the accessible, bootcamp-to-job pipeline that existed from 2015-2022.

Sources & Method

This analysis combines:

  • Reddit discussion from r/accelerate (November 2025)
  • Stanford Digital Economy Study on AI impact (employment data for ages 22-25)
  • Indeed and Pragmatic Engineer job posting data (2020-2025 trends)
  • GitHub Copilot and Cursor AI adoption statistics
  • JetBrains State of Developer Ecosystem 2025
  • Harvard Business School study on AI and junior employment
  • Coding bootcamp placement reports (Course Report, TripleTen, Springboard)
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics CS/CE graduate unemployment data

All statistics dated and sourced. No speculation presented as fact.

Framework credit: The "commodity vs elite" split builds on Nate B Jones's AI Training vs AI Fluency framework, applied specifically to software engineering.

Related Reading

The bottom line: Software engineers on LinkedIn aren't lying when they say they feel safe. They're just focusing on their own safety while ignoring the collapse of the entry-level market.

The 10-year veterans will probably be fine (if they adapt). The bootcamp grads trying to break in? They're walking into a market that's already gone.

The denial isn't about whether senior devs are safe. It's about pretending the ladder behind them didn't just get pulled up.

← Back to All Posts